When "Yay! Daddy's Home!" turns to "No, Daddy. No!"
Homecoming
We all dream of it for weeks and months. We envision the
perfect reunion. We may even have it; the happy tears, warm embrace, and
long-awaited kiss. The family is finally together again and all is right with
the world.
Then - the reunion glow fades. It may only take a few days
or it could be a month or so later that everyone is back to reality.
However, reality has shifted some because the family has
functioned for half a year or more without one of its key components. Reintegrating
one parent into their role within the family can be a complicated matter. It
can be downright difficult. The joyous thought of having your partner back to
help with chores, bath time, bedtime, and such is met with screams and, “No,
Daddy!”
Each deployment is experienced differently. No two can be
the same, as the family is never at the same ages or stages for each. So, even
if last deployment had a smooth sailing reunion, this one might not. Or it
might be the next one. There is some evidence that successive deployments can
lead to increased behavior problems and attachment issues in children (Barker
& Berry, 2009).
Some of the research and theory behind the why of this
difficult reunion:
Attachment, or the bond between the child and caregiver, is
established over the first two to three years of life (Bowlby, 1988). Attachment
theory originated from the work John Bowlby did observing the impact on
orphaned children as a result of World War II. When a caregiver is missing
during this critical period of life, it impacts the attachment between them.
Children can also form different attachment patterns to different caregivers. So even if they have a secure attachment with
one parent; they can form a different pattern attachment with the other parent,
depending on their interactions.
Here is a table reference of the attachment patterns:
Child
and caregiver behavior patterns before the age of 18 months (Ainsworth, et.al., 1978)
|
||
Attachment
pattern |
Child
|
Caregiver
|
Secure
|
Uses caregiver as a secure base
for exploration. Protests caregiver's departure and seeks proximity and is
comforted on return, returning to exploration. May be comforted by the
stranger but shows clear preference for the caregiver.
|
Responds appropriately, promptly
and consistently to needs. Caregiver has successfully formed a secure
parental attachment bond to the child.
|
Anxious
|
Clingy, unable to cope with
absences of the caregiver. Seeks constant reassurances.
|
Excessively protective of the
child, and unable to allow risk-taking, and steps towards independence.
|
Avoidant
|
Little affective sharing in play.
Little or no distress on departure, little or no visible response to return,
ignoring or turning away with no effort to maintain contact if picked up.
Treats the stranger similarly to the caregiver. The child feels that there is
no attachment; the child is "rebellious" and has a lower self-image
and self-esteem.
|
Little or no response to
distressed child. Discourages crying and encourages independence.
|
Ambivalent/resistant
|
Unable to use caregiver as a
secure base, seeking proximity before separation occurs. Distressed on
separation with ambivalence, anger, reluctance to warm to caregiver and
return to play on return. Preoccupied with caregiver's availability, seeking
contact but resisting angrily when it is achieved. Not easily calmed by
stranger. In this relationship, the child always feels anxious because the
caregiver's availability is never consistent.
|
Inconsistent between appropriate
and neglectful responses. Generally will only respond after increased
attachment behavior from the infant.
|
Disorganized
|
Stereotypies
on return such as freezing or rocking. Lack of coherent attachment strategy
shown by contradictory, disoriented behaviors such as approaching but with
the back turned.
|
Frightened or frightening behavior,
intrusiveness, withdrawal, negativity, role confusion, affective
communication errors and maltreatment. Very often associated with many forms
of abuse towards the child.
|
So, the research and theory gives a framework for why this
is happening. It’s not that you are abnormal or that your child is being bad or
that you are a bad parent. A huge component of their lives has been absent for
a huge fraction of their entire life. (Just think if they are 1 and Daddy was
gone for 6 months – that is ½ of their life)
What do you do when the coparenting that you were so looking
forward to doing again becomes yet another struggle?
We found that when I (Mommy) was around it was, “No Daddy.”
But, if I was taken out of the equation, everything went much more smoothly.
So, we did small things at first and progressively increased the amount of time
with Daddy one on ones. Daddy picked up from school solo. Daddy did bath-time
solo. And, eventually, the whole evening was with just Daddy.
We both reassure that everything is ok. We also reassure
that both of us are staying or coming right back. We definitely try to soak up
all the family time we can. Post-deployment leave was a really important time
and great opportunity for us to spend several days as just us for the entire
day.
It has for sure been a process. We still see a little bit of
the, “No,” towards Daddy when Mommy is around. And still some jealous tugs when
Mommy and Daddy are in an embrace. But there are many more smiles and a lot
fewer battles.
What are some of the things you have done to help
reestablish this relationship post-deployment?